It Has Been 49 Years Since Roe v. Wade. Why Are We Still Debating This?
Why is a woman’s right to decide for her own body even a political debate at all? And what, for that matter, about other rights that have been given to the people in the 49 years since?
The singular upside to not having sex with my husband — because believe me, there’s only one upside — is that I can’t possibly get pregnant.
This is good for two reasons: first, we don’t want to have children, and second, my cardiologist finally put me on a statin for my high cholesterol, which he was reluctant to do for years because I’m “of child-bearing age,” and if I were to conceive, “they’d be deformed.” All things he pointed out to me in my early 20s; I already knew then I didn’t want to get pregnant, though at the time I still acknowledged that may change. By now, I believe that if it were going to, it would have.
This isn’t a criticism against my doctor, because I know he must consider all possibilities and risks involved before prescribing a medication, but I do have to wonder, when did the health of a hypothetical child — one that hasn’t been conceived yet, does not exist yet — become more important than my own?